Multiple sclerosis treatment • updated September 2026

BTK Inhibitors in Multiple Sclerosis: What Changed by 2026

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors can no longer be viewed only as a distant experimental prospect. In 2026, one drug in the class — tolebrutinib — received European Union authorization for a defined group of patients with secondary progressive MS, while fenebrutinib and remibrutinib reported positive phase III results.

At the same time, outcomes differ substantially between individual drugs. It is therefore more accurate not to speak of a single “BTK class effect”, but to evaluate each molecule separately, together with the MS phenotype, trial endpoint and safety profile.

The central idea behind BTK inhibition is to influence both B-cell activation and innate immune cells, including microglia. This is particularly relevant to progression that may continue independently of clinical relapses.
Mechanism of action

Why BTK inhibitors became important in multiple sclerosis

BTK is an intracellular signaling enzyme involved in activation of B lymphocytes and several innate immune cell populations. Some BTK inhibitors can cross the blood–brain barrier and influence immune cells within the central nervous system.

B cells

BTK participates in B-cell receptor signaling. BTK inhibition reduces pathological B-cell activation but, unlike anti-CD20 therapy, does not necessarily cause profound B-cell depletion.

Microglia

BTK is also expressed in myeloid cells, including microglia. The class is therefore being studied as a possible way to influence chronic inflammation within the CNS.

Progression

Interest in BTK inhibition increased as understanding grew of progressive MS biology and disability accumulation without obvious relapses.

BTK inhibitors are not one uniform group of drugs. They differ in chemical structure, reversibility of BTK binding, selectivity, CNS penetration and safety profile. Trial results therefore cannot automatically be extrapolated from one molecule to another.
Situation as of September 2026

Which BTK inhibitors matter most for MS now?

Drug Main evidence MS phenotype Status
Tolebrutinib
Cenrifki
HERCULES: lower risk of confirmed disability progression in nrSPMS SPMS without relapses Approved in the EU
Fenebrutinib FENhance 1/2: superiority to teriflunomide for relapse rate; FENtrepid: non-inferior to ocrelizumab for the primary PPMS endpoint RMS and PPMS Under regulatory review
Remibrutinib REMODEL-1/2: positive phase III topline results for relapse rate and MRI activity RMS Investigational
Evobrutinib Phase III trials did not show superiority to teriflunomide RMS Program did not confirm expected efficacy
Orelabrutinib Marked MRI effect in earlier studies RMS Earlier stage of development
Important: European Union authorization of tolebrutinib does not mean automatic availability in every country. Regulatory status, real-world access and reimbursement conditions vary.
The first approved member of the class

Tolebrutinib: the key result was in nonrelapsing SPMS, not relapsing MS

The most important tolebrutinib trial was HERCULES in patients with secondary progressive MS without relapses. Tolebrutinib was compared with placebo, with disability accumulation as the principal focus.

0.69

Hazard ratio

The risk of 6-month confirmed disability progression was lower with tolebrutinib.

22.6%

Tolebrutinib

This proportion of participants reached the primary disability-progression endpoint.

30.7%

Placebo

This proportion of participants reached the same endpoint in the control group.

In June 2026, the European Commission approved Cenrifki (tolebrutinib) for adults with secondary progressive MS who had not experienced relapses during the previous two years.

Why this is genuinely new

For a person with nonrelapsing SPMS, the main problem is not frequent attacks but gradual accumulation of neurological disability. HERCULES is therefore important as an attempt to influence progression itself, rather than only classical inflammatory activity.

More about recognizing transition to progression: secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

What happened in relapsing MS?

In the two GEMINI trials, tolebrutinib did not show superiority to teriflunomide for annualized relapse rate. This is an important example of why BTK inhibitors should not simply be viewed as “new powerful tablets against relapses”.

A pooled GEMINI analysis suggested a signal for 6-month confirmed disability worsening, but because of the statistical testing hierarchy this should not be interpreted as a separately proven formal advantage.

And in primary progressive MS?

The PERSEUS study in primary progressive MS did not meet its primary endpoint. This again shows that even for the same drug, results depend on the clinical phenotype of MS.

Positive phase III program

Fenebrutinib: strong results in both RMS and PPMS

Fenebrutinib differs from most other molecules in the class because it is a reversible, noncovalent BTK inhibitor. In 2026, results from three key phase III trials were presented.

FENhance 1 and 2 — relapsing MS

Compared with teriflunomide, annualized relapse rate was reduced by 51.1% in FENhance 1 and by 58.5% in FENhance 2.

New active MRI lesions were also substantially reduced. Favorable trends were observed for progression measures, but the main conclusions from these studies relate primarily to control of relapsing inflammatory activity.

FENtrepid — primary progressive MS

Fenebrutinib was compared not with placebo, but with ocrelizumab. The study met its primary objective of non-inferiority for 12-week composite confirmed disability progression.

The hazard ratio was 0.88 versus ocrelizumab; the risk was numerically 12% lower, but the study was designed primarily to demonstrate non-inferiority.

Safety requires careful interpretation. In the RMS trials, rates of liver-enzyme elevation were comparable with teriflunomide, but an imbalance in the number of deaths was observed in the fenebrutinib groups. The causes varied and no single common causal mechanism was established, but these data form part of the regulatory safety assessment.

Fenebrutinib is not yet a routinely approved MS therapy. Its program has been submitted for regulatory review, and its eventual place in treatment will depend not only on efficacy but also on the final safety assessment.

New data from September 2026

Remibrutinib: positive topline results from REMODEL-1 and REMODEL-2

On 1 September 2026, results from the two phase III REMODEL-1 and REMODEL-2 trials in relapsing MS were announced.

Relapses

In both studies, remibrutinib significantly reduced annualized relapse rate compared with teriflunomide.

MRI

Superiority was reported for key secondary MRI measures of inflammatory disease activity.

Progression

The pooled analysis showed a favorable signal for confirmed disability progression, including a nominally significant result for 6-month CDP.

At the time this page was updated, these were topline data: full scientific presentation and publication were still awaited. Exact effect sizes and the final safety analysis should therefore be judged after the complete dataset is presented.

The preliminary company announcement did not identify the drug-induced liver-injury signal seen in some other BTK programs. Until the full dataset is available, however, this should not be considered a definitive comparative safety advantage.

Why negative trials matter too

Evobrutinib: a convincing mechanism does not guarantee phase III success

Evobrutinib was one of the first BTK inhibitors to show a marked MRI effect in phase II. However, in the evolutionRMS 1 and 2 trials, it did not outperform teriflunomide on the primary clinical endpoint.

Liver safety was an additional limitation. This experience substantially changed how BTK inhibition is viewed as a class: CNS penetration and BTK suppression alone are not enough; selectivity, pharmacokinetics and the safety of each specific molecule also matter.

Place among modern therapies

BTK inhibitors and anti-CD20 therapy: not simply “tablet versus infusion”

Anti-CD20

Ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and other treatments in this strategy strongly reduce peripheral B-cell activity and have well-established high efficacy against relapses and new MRI activity.

Their advantages include a large evidence base and a clearly defined place in modern MS treatment strategy.

BTK inhibitors

They do not necessarily cause profound B-cell depletion and may potentially influence microglia and compartmentalized inflammation within the CNS.

The class is still heterogeneous: efficacy and risks differ substantially between individual molecules.

The question “which is better — BTK or anti-CD20?” is still too broad. The answer depends on MS phenotype, disease activity, age, previous therapy, infection risk, pregnancy plans, laboratory monitoring and availability of the specific drug.

When new clinical or MRI activity appears, the first task is to establish whether the current treatment is truly providing insufficient control. More: when to switch treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Risks and monitoring

Why safety cannot be discussed as a single “class profile”

Liver

Drug-induced liver injury is recognized as an important risk with tolebrutinib, so strict laboratory monitoring is required. Transaminase elevations have also been observed in some other BTK programs.

Infections

The degree of immune-system effect depends on the molecule and its selectivity. BTK inhibitors should not automatically be assumed to be less immunosuppressive or safer than monoclonal antibodies.

Long-term data

For new drugs, not only the first 1–2 years of trials matter, but also longer follow-up, rare adverse events and experience outside clinical trials.

Practical conclusions

What does all this mean for a person with multiple sclerosis?

1. Tolebrutinib has already changed the situation in nonrelapsing SPMS

This is the first approval of a BTK inhibitor in MS and an important confirmation that progression without relapses can be a separate therapeutic target.

2. Fenebrutinib and remibrutinib are the most interesting current candidates for relapsing MS

Both drugs have reported positive phase III data against teriflunomide, but their final place among highly effective therapies will become clearer after regulatory review and further safety data.

3. Fenebrutinib is particularly interesting in PPMS

FENtrepid demonstrated non-inferiority for the primary endpoint compared with ocrelizumab. This may be important for people with primary progressive MS, where disease-modifying treatment options remain limited.

4. A drug should not be chosen simply because its mechanism is new

The decision should consider MS activity, rate of progression, MRI, biomarkers, previous treatment and the individual risk profile. Modern biomarkers can complement this assessment but do not replace clinical judgment.

Consultation

How to assess the place of a new therapy in an individual situation

During consultation, MS phenotype and activity, MRI changes, signs of progression, previous therapy and individual risks can be reviewed together, followed by discussion of reasonable options for the next treatment strategy.

Appointments / contact
This page is also available in other languages:
Author

Dr. Lidiia Prakhova

Neurologist, Doctor of Medical Sciences. Main areas of clinical work include neuroimmunology, multiple sclerosis, NMOSD and MOGAD.

The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not replace an individual medical consultation.

Key scientific references

  1. Oh J, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, et al. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a new class of multiple sclerosis therapeutics. Lancet Neurol. 2026;25(7):673–688. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(26)00141-9.
  2. Fox RJ, Bar-Or A, Traboulsee A, et al. Tolebrutinib in nonrelapsing secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:1883–1892. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415988.
  3. Oh J, Arnold DL, Cree BAC, et al. Tolebrutinib versus teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:1893–1904. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415985.
  4. Montalban X, Fox RJ, Hartung HP, et al. Efficacy and safety of evobrutinib versus teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis (evolutionRMS 1 and 2). Lancet Neurol. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00328-4.
  5. Bar-Or A, Oh J, Giovannoni G, et al. Efficacy and safety of fenebrutinib vs ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: primary results of the phase III FENtrepid study. Neurology. 2026;106(11 Suppl 1). DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000216067.
  6. Oh J, et al. Efficacy and safety of fenebrutinib vs teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis: results of the FENhance 1 and 2 studies. Neurology. 2026;106(11 Suppl 1). DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000217910.
  7. Jain RW, Rayatpour A, Hagen K, et al. Investigations of remibrutinib in models pertinent to multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2026;23(3):e00923. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00923.
  8. Novartis. Phase III REMODEL-1 and REMODEL-2 topline results for remibrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis. 1 September 2026. Official announcement.
  9. European Commission / Sanofi. Cenrifki (tolebrutinib) approved in the EU for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis without relapses. 23 June 2026. Official announcement.
Made on
Tilda